
I'm impressed at the increasing number of producers who have online tasting notes for their wines. I find them very helpful when I'm tasting wines at home. It's not quite the same obviously as being in a class and hearing others describe the wine but they are a useful comparison to what I'm getting from the wine.
Take the 2 chardonnays I tried the other day, one South African and the other Kiwi. With the Zonnebloem 2007 from Stellenbosch, I got vanilla from the oak and yet it's not mentioned in the producer's notes but I also got what they describe as citrus notes, pear and peach. The tasting note also said all the fruit for that vintage was sourced from vineyards in the Stellenbosch whereas the label describes itself as "Wine from the Western Cape".
The Montana 2007 from Gisborne I thought had lovely lime and lemon flavours with some tropical fruit. They mentioned peaches also but I couldn't get that.
What I've learned from the WSET Diploma studies is that there is a large element of subjectivity in tasting. Just because the producer says peach, and I don't detect it, doesn't mean I am wrong. It just means the palate of the winemaker is more attuned to nuances than mine which you would expect. Alternatively, and not that I'm being cynical, that the PR person has got carried away with the descriptors in a bid to talk up the wine!

