I was not surprised with the results of my searches finding very few producers either on Facebook or Twitter. I tweeted on that as @grapefan which then generated two further tweets. One was from Hallgarten Druitt (@HD_FineWines) who tweeted the names of four of their portfolio who were at the event. The other tweet came from Loredan Gasparini Venegazzu along the lines of " and don't forget about me". Venegazzu became the first table I visited. Lorenzo Palla was very clear about the benefits of social media to him. If it hadn't been for Twitter he wouldn't be exporting wines to the US as he "met" his US importer electronically , so there has been no travel expense involved in getting into this new market.
The second producer with a slightly different take on social media was Franz Haas. Andi Punter of the producer makes a point of responding to every comment he sees on Twitter seeing as a good but indirect way of marketing his wines and generating name awareness for his brand.The third chat I had was with Jose Rallo of Donnafugata in Sicily. We talked about the recent visit of a group from the Institute of Masters of Wine and how this had generated a large number of tweets.
So why did this basic research show? That for a little bit of effort there can be quite a lot of return either in new contacts or generating awareness of your wines. When you are a small producer with no budget for a marketing department it's a great way of getting your name out there alongside the the big boys. However it's more than just marketing as it generates an interaction with the end customer which generates loyalty
As another part of my experiment I posted on the Facebook pages of a couple of the producers at the event and got nothing back in response. As a result I am now much more liable to seek out the wines of the producers who have taken the time to interact with me rather than just market themselves to everyone.
Maybe there's a learning point here for wineries?
Maybe there's a learning point here for wineries?






